ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA in TEACHER'S BODY SECONDARY EDUCATION SPECIALTY: ENGLISH (011)
HERE THE LINK TO THE SELECTION PROCESS IN THE COMMUNITY OF MADRID THIS YEAR 2025. ATTENTION TO THE DATES TO PRESENT PAPERS from 3/3/2025 TO 28/3/25.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR THE EXAMS IN THE SELECTION PROCEDURE ACCESS 1 AND 2: ENTRY AND RESERVATION FOR PEOPLE WITH ACCREDITED DISABILITY. (GIVEN in THE LAST CALL 2023: HERE THE LINK)
FIRST EXAM (part A + part B)
FIRST EXAM - part A (PRACTICAL)
Completion of a PRACTICAL EXERCISE to verify that the applicant possesses the scientific training and command of the technical skills corresponding to the specialty they are applying for.
A) General Considerations
- Writing errors that show confusion or lack of knowledge of the lexicon used will be penalized with 0.1 points per error. (Example: "I am writting").
- Grammatical errors that prevent the understanding of the content will be penalized by completely invalidating the answer.
- Grammatical errors that do not prevent this understanding will be penalized with 0.1 points. (Example: errors of prepositional regime "look him", errors of verbal regime: "I don't mind go").
- The deduction of points for the described typology will be applied to the final grade obtained in each exercise of the exam.
- Mistakes made in words that are repeated will be counted only once.
B) Development of the exam
The exam will consist of 3 DIFFERENT EXERCISES: AN AUDIO EXERCISE, A TEXT COMMENTARY, AND A TRANSLATION EXERCISE.
• In the AUDIO EXERCISE, which will be heard twice consecutively, the candidate will have to complete the gaps in an exercise (gap-filling) with the literal information understood, as well as an exercise with questions posed by the panel in which comprehension, both direct and inferential, of the listened audio is assessed, with the third exercise consisting of creating a summary of the information presented in the audio. To award the grade, it will be taken into account whether the candidate demonstrates oral comprehension of the information heard, the ability to synthesize said information, as well as the correctness of written expression in the provided answer. This exercise will last 45 minutes.
• In THE TEXT COMMENTARY EXERCISE, based on a text written in current prose of a non-exclusively literary nature, the candidate will answer questions about the type and genre of the fragment, the communicative functions, the stylistic resources and any other questions posed by the panel in this regard. To award the grade, it will be taken into account whether the candidate demonstrates the morphosyntactic, lexical-semantic and pragmatic knowledge required in the questions, as well as the correctness of written expression in the provided answer. This exercise will last 75 minutes.
• The TRANSLATION EXERCISE will consist of a reverse translation of a current literary or journalistic text, without a dictionary, and a direct translation of a current literary or journalistic text, without a dictionary. This exercise will last 60 minutes.
The total time for the three parts of the exam will be 3 hours. The candidate may only use a black or blue ink pen. The use of spell checkers or pens with erasable ink will not be allowed. The use of any additional material will not be permitted.
C) Evaluation and Grading Criteria
GRADING:
The grade for this exercise will be from 0 to 10 points.
The score of each candidate will be the arithmetic mean of the grades of the members present in the Panel, and these should be calculated with an approximation of up to ten thousandths to avoid, as far as possible, ties. When there is a difference of three or more whole numbers between the scores awarded by the members of the Panel, the highest and lowest scores will be automatically excluded, and the average score will be found among the remaining scores.
The weighted grade of this part will be 70% of the total grade of the first exam and will be calculated by multiplying the obtained grade by 0.7. The minimum score obtained in each of the parts (before weighting) must be equal to or greater than 2.5 points.
1. AUDIO EXERCISE........................................2.5 points
• Identifies the main topic of the listening, both the transcendent and the less relevant details.
• Distinguishes facts and opinions.
• Understands key words, phrases and expressions.
1.2. Written Expression
• Demonstrates literal and inferential comprehension of the content presented in the listened fragment.
• Uses a wide linguistic repertoire and a correct register to answer the questions posed.
1.3. Synthesis Capacity
• Summarizes the information transmitted in the audio correctly and succinctly.
2.TEXT COMMENTARY EXERCISE .............4.5 points
• Knows how to analyse the text from the morphosyntactic, lexical-semantic and pragmatic point of view.
• Identifies the communicative intentions of the author.
• Demonstrates global and specific comprehension of the text.
• Identifies the sociocultural characteristics of the text.
2.2. Written Expression
• Uses a wide linguistic repertoire and a correct register to answer the questions raised.
• Demonstrates global and specific comprehension of the fragment to be translated.
• Identifies the sociocultural characteristics of the text.
3.2. Written Expression
• Accurately transposes the lexical, syntactic and pragmatic content of the fragment in L1 to L2 and vice versa.
• Does not use calques, "false friends", or contradictions when transposing L1 into L2 and vice versa.
3.3. Sociocultural Features
• Correctly interprets the sociocultural features of the translated language in both direct and reverse translation.
FIRST EXAM - part B (DEVELOPMENT OF A TOPIC)
A) Development of the exam
The exam will consist of THE WRITTEN DEVELOPMENT OF A TOPIC CHOSEN BY THE CANDIDATE, FROM AMONG 4 TOPICS RANDOMLY SELECTED BY THE PANEL FROM THOSE CORRESPONDING TO THE SYLLABUS OF THE SPECIALTY. The total time for the development of this exam will be 2 hours. The candidate may only use a black or blue ink pen. The use of spell checkers or pens with erasable ink will not be allowed. The use of any additional material will not be permitted. Bibliographic references will be mentioned following the MLA (Modern Language Association) style for both citing references and making citations in the text.
B) Evaluation and Grading Criteria
GRADING:
The grade for this exercise will be from 0 to 10 points.
The score of each candidate will be the arithmetic mean of the grades of the members present in the Panel, and these should be calculated with an approximation of up to ten thousandths to avoid, as far as possible, ties. When there is a difference of three or more whole numbers between the scores awarded by the members of the Panel, the highest and lowest scores will be automatically excluded, and the average score will be found among the remaining scores.
The weighted grade of this part will be 30% of the total of the first exam and will be calculated by multiplying the obtained grade by 0.3. The minimum score obtained in each of the parts (before weighting) must be equal to or greater than 2.5 points.
STRUCTURE OF THE TOPIC .....................................1 point
1.2. Introduction (justification and importance of the topic).
1.3. Development of all the sections included in the title and index.
1.4. Conclusion (synthesis, where all the sections of the topic are related).
EXPRESSION AND PRESENTATION...............................1 point
2.2. Cleanliness, clarity and legibility of the document.
SPECIFIC CONTENTS OF THE TOPIC ......................8 points
3.2. Contents adjusted to the statements and in accordance with current regulations. 3.3. Illustration of the contents with examples, diagrams, graphs....
3.4. Logical and orderly sequence.
3.5. Correct and updated use of technical language.
3.6. Relationship with teaching practice. Application in the classroom.
3.7. Well-founded final conclusion.
3.8. Bibliographic references, authors, web pages... (cites diverse, up-to-date and reliable sources) in those specialties where appropriate.
3.9. Personal and original elaboration.
3.10. Citation of authors, linguistic schools or currents of methodology of English language teaching to support their arguments.
4. ORTHOGRAPHIC RULES
- Writing errors that show confusion or lack of knowledge of the lexicon used will be penalized with 0.1 points per error. (Example: "I am writting").
- Grammatical errors that prevent the understanding of the content will be penalized by completely invalidating the answer.
- Grammatical errors that do not prevent this understanding will be penalized with 0.1 points. (Example: errors of prepositional regime "look him", errors of verbal regime: "I don't mind go").
- The deduction of points for the described typology will be applied to the final grade obtained in each exercise of the exam.
- Mistakes made in words that are repeated will be counted only once.
SECOND EXAM (part A + part B) THE PRESENTATION AND DEFENCE BEFORE THE PANEL OF A DIDACTIC PROGRAMMING.
GRADING:
In addition, the following penalties will be applied to the total score:
- In the event that the panel detects that the DIDACTIC PROGRAMMING does not meet the requirement of its own elaboration, or does not meet the formal requirement of the minimum number of 15 Didactic Units, the score that will be awarded to part A of the Second Exam will be zero points.
- If the Programming exceeds the number of pages established in the Resolution of the call, the penalty will be 2 points. In addition, the sheets and their content incorporated from number 80 onwards will be annulled and therefore not assessable, nor will they be taken into account for the purposes of the presentation and defense.
- In the event that the didactic programming is not presented in accordance with all the formal requirements established in the Resolution, it will be penalized with up to 5 points.
GRADING:
The grade for this exercise will be from 0 to 10 points.
The score of each candidate will be the arithmetic mean of the grades of the members present in the Panel, and these should be calculated with an approximation of up to ten thousandths to avoid, as far as possible, ties. When there is a difference of three or more whole numbers between the scores awarded by the members of the Panel, the highest and lowest scores will be automatically excluded, and the average score will be found among the remaining scores.
The weighted grade of this part will be calculated by multiplying the grade obtained in Part A by 0.3.
B) Development of the exam
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA of the PROGRAMMING DOCUMENT .....................................................Up to 3 points
1. Appearance, design and originality.
2. Structure, justifies and interrelates, with an overview, all curricular elements.
EXPOSITION ................................Up to 5 points
2. Presentation of a motivating introduction, contextualizing the Didactic Programming in accordance with the reality and needs of the environment in which it is located. Justification of its choice (due to current relevance, impact, challenge, commitment, educational intention...).
3. Concretion of the objectives: correct formulation, coherence, adaptation to the stage of development and to the characteristics of the students.
4. Selection of competences, in accordance with the proposed objectives and framed in the official curriculum, appropriate to the stage of development and the proposed context.
5. Selection of contents/basic knowledge, in accordance with the proposed objectives and framed in the official curriculum, appropriate to the stage of development and the proposed context.
6. Methodology. Proposal, relationship and treatment of resources.
7. Implementation and use of information and communication technologies.
8. Timing and sequencing.
9. Evaluation: Moments, agents, techniques, instruments and procedures. Evaluation and grading criteria. Evaluation of teaching practice.
10. Treatment of student diversity.
DEFENCE & DEBATE ................. Up to 4 points
2. Mastery of the subject, course or module in which the Didactic Unit/Learning Situation is framed.
3. Security and confidence in the exposition.
4. Clarity, coherence and order of the discourse.
5. Appropriate use of language, terminological precision and richness of vocabulary.
6. Practical application in the classroom.
7. Evidence in the performance of teaching competences. Incorporation of skills and abilities to manage the classroom.
8. Concretion in the answer to the questions and doubts raised by the Panel.
9. Contribution of data and arguments that have not been clear in the exposition.
MORE ABOUT THE CIVIL EXAM:
SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR ALL LEVELS
USE OF ENGLISH
WORD FORMATION
REVIEW CONDITIONALS WITH ME
PRESENT SIMPLE vs PRESENT CONTINUOS
MOTIVACIÓN A LA ESCRITURA
HOW TO WRITE AN ESSAY
HOW TO WRITE A PROPOSAL
HOW TO WRITE A REVIEW
HOW TO WRITE LETTERS
MOTIVACIÓN A LA LECTURA Y ESCUCHA
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario
Thank you for your words! They mean a lot to me.
Ana Language Coach